From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753138Ab2JJGOY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:14:24 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:50646 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386Ab2JJGOQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:14:16 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: G/p1oOU3jTexaBFA1dBfVW6AlfcfhGoNDMH6qdlMzbQE 1349849655 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:47:50 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Mel Gorman Cc: Stable , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Dave Jones , Christoph Lameter , Hugh Dickins , LKML , Linux-MM Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Memory policy corruption fixes -stable Message-ID: <20121010004750.GA22823@kroah.com> References: <1349801921-16598-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1349801921-16598-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:58:36PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > This is a backport of the series "Memory policy corruption fixes V2". This > should apply to 3.6-stable, 3.5-stable, 3.4-stable and 3.0-stable without > any difficulty. It will not apply cleanly to 3.2 but just drop the "revert" > patch and the rest of the series should apply. > > I tested 3.6-stable and 3.0-stable with just the revert and trinity breaks > as expected for the mempolicy tests. Applying the full series in both case > allowed trinity to complete successfully. Andi Kleen reported previously > that the series fixed a database performance regression[1]. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/585 > > include/linux/mempolicy.h | 2 +- > mm/mempolicy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) Looks good, thanks, now all queued up. greg k-h