From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753693Ab2JMR2x (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:28:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:43076 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751196Ab2JMR2w (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:28:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:28:43 +0900 From: Greg KH To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "apw@canonical.com" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "olaf@aepfle.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "jasowang@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools: hv: Return the full kernel version Message-ID: <20121013172843.GA11040@kroah.com> References: <1350085210-11108-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20121013064435.GA9794@kroah.com> <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF930A35B29@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426367E2313C2449837CD2DE46E7EAF930A35B29@SN2PRD0310MB382.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:03:31PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:45 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; olaf@aepfle.de; > > apw@canonical.com; jasowang@redhat.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools: hv: Return the full kernel version > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:40:10PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Currently, we are returning the same string for both OSBuildNumber > > > and OSVersion keys. Return the full uts string for the OSBuild > > > key since Windows does not impose any restrictions on this. > > > > You sent me 2 patches, both 1/1, that modify the same file. Which one > > comes first? Please resend both properly, and also let me know if these > > are things that should be going into 3.7 or can wait for 3.8. > > Initially, I sent them out in the order I wanted them > applied. I will resend them as a patch set. They can wait for 3.8. The "order" you send them isn't always the order they are received by people, that is why you need to have the X/2 numbering scheme. greg k-h