linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:10:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121015191018.GA4816@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121015190958.GA4799@redhat.com>

This patch adds the new sleeping lock, brw_mutex. Unlike rw_semaphore
it allows multiple writers too, just "read" and "write" are mutually
exclusive.

brw_start_read() and brw_end_read() are extremely cheap, they only do
this_cpu_inc(read_ctr) + atomic_read() if there are no waiting writers.

OTOH it is write-biased, any brw_start_write() blocks the new readers.
But "write" is slow, it does synchronize_sched() to serialize with
preempt_disable() in brw_start_read(), and wait_event(write_waitq) can
have a lot of extra wakeups before percpu-counter-sum becomes zero.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/brw_mutex.h |   22 +++++++++++++++
 lib/Makefile              |    2 +-
 lib/brw_mutex.c           |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/brw_mutex.h
 create mode 100644 lib/brw_mutex.c

diff --git a/include/linux/brw_mutex.h b/include/linux/brw_mutex.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..16b8d5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/brw_mutex.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_BRW_MUTEX_H
+#define _LINUX_BRW_MUTEX_H
+
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+
+struct brw_mutex {
+	long __percpu		*read_ctr;
+	atomic_t		write_ctr;
+	wait_queue_head_t	read_waitq;
+	wait_queue_head_t	write_waitq;
+};
+
+extern int brw_mutex_init(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+extern void brw_start_read(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+extern void brw_end_read(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+extern void brw_start_write(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+extern void brw_end_write(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+#endif
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 3128e35..18f2876 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
 	 idr.o int_sqrt.o extable.o \
 	 sha1.o md5.o irq_regs.o reciprocal_div.o argv_split.o \
 	 proportions.o flex_proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \
-	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o
+	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o brw_mutex.o
 
 lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o
 lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
diff --git a/lib/brw_mutex.c b/lib/brw_mutex.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..41984a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/brw_mutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#include <linux/brw_mutex.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
+int brw_mutex_init(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&brw->read_waitq);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
+	brw->read_ctr = alloc_percpu(long);
+	return brw->read_ctr ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+void brw_start_read(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	for (;;) {
+		bool done = false;
+
+		preempt_disable();
+		if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) {
+			__this_cpu_inc(*brw->read_ctr);
+			done = true;
+		}
+		preempt_enable();
+
+		if (likely(done))
+			break;
+
+		__wait_event(brw->read_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr));
+	}
+}
+
+void brw_end_read(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	this_cpu_dec(*brw->read_ctr);
+
+	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr)))
+		wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
+}
+
+static inline long brw_read_ctr(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	long sum = 0;
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		sum += per_cpu(*brw->read_ctr, cpu);
+
+	return sum;
+}
+
+void brw_start_write(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr);
+	synchronize_sched();
+	/*
+	 * Thereafter brw_*_read() must see write_ctr != 0,
+	 * and we should see the result of __this_cpu_inc().
+	 */
+	wait_event(brw->write_waitq, brw_read_ctr(brw) == 0);
+}
+
+void brw_end_write(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->write_ctr))
+		wake_up_all(&brw->read_waitq);
+}
-- 
1.5.5.1


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-15 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15 19:09 [RFC PATCH 0/2] uprobes: register/unregister can race with fork Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-15 23:28   ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 15:56     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 18:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-17 16:37         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:28           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 19:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-17 16:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:44       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 16:24         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 16:38           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 17:57             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 19:28               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 12:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 15:32                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 17:57                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 22:54                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24  3:08                         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25 14:09                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 23:40                             ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-26 12:06                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 13:22                                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-26 14:12                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 15:23                                     ` mark_files_ro && sb_end_write Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 16:09                                     ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:49                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 23:09                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 15:12                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 19:28               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-22 23:36                 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:37                   ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:39                     ` [PATCH 2/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use rcu_read_lock_sched Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:16                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 17:18                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 18:20                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 18:43                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:43                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 14:54                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 15:07                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 16:15                             ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 16:59                     ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:05                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 18:27                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:41                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:29                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 20:32                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 21:39                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:23                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:22                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 20:36                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:44                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 23:57                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 12:39                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 13:48                                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 19:23                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:45                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-23 20:57                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-24 15:11                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 21:26                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 20:32                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-30 18:48                   ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41                     ` [PATCH 0/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41                       ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-01 15:10                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-01 15:34                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06                           ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06                             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 17:04                               ` [PATCH v3 " Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-07 17:47                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 19:17                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-08 13:42                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08  1:23                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08  1:16                               ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:33                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 16:27                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:48                             ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 13:48                               ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 20:07                                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-08 21:08                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 23:41                                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09  0:41                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09  3:23                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 16:35                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 16:59                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 12:47                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09 15:46                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 17:01                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 18:10                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 18:19                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-10  0:55                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 15:45                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:38                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 18:27                                   ` [PATCH -mm] percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessari ly.fix Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:31                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-16 23:22                                     ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-18 19:32                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-01 15:43                         ` [PATCH 1/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-01 18:33                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 16:18                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: Use brw_mutex to fix register/unregister vs dup_mmap() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18  7:03   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121015191018.GA4816@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).