From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:10:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121015191018.GA4816@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121015190958.GA4799@redhat.com>
This patch adds the new sleeping lock, brw_mutex. Unlike rw_semaphore
it allows multiple writers too, just "read" and "write" are mutually
exclusive.
brw_start_read() and brw_end_read() are extremely cheap, they only do
this_cpu_inc(read_ctr) + atomic_read() if there are no waiting writers.
OTOH it is write-biased, any brw_start_write() blocks the new readers.
But "write" is slow, it does synchronize_sched() to serialize with
preempt_disable() in brw_start_read(), and wait_event(write_waitq) can
have a lot of extra wakeups before percpu-counter-sum becomes zero.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/brw_mutex.h | 22 +++++++++++++++
lib/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/brw_mutex.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/brw_mutex.h
create mode 100644 lib/brw_mutex.c
diff --git a/include/linux/brw_mutex.h b/include/linux/brw_mutex.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..16b8d5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/brw_mutex.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_BRW_MUTEX_H
+#define _LINUX_BRW_MUTEX_H
+
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+
+struct brw_mutex {
+ long __percpu *read_ctr;
+ atomic_t write_ctr;
+ wait_queue_head_t read_waitq;
+ wait_queue_head_t write_waitq;
+};
+
+extern int brw_mutex_init(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+extern void brw_start_read(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+extern void brw_end_read(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+extern void brw_start_write(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+extern void brw_end_write(struct brw_mutex *brw);
+
+#endif
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 3128e35..18f2876 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
idr.o int_sqrt.o extable.o \
sha1.o md5.o irq_regs.o reciprocal_div.o argv_split.o \
proportions.o flex_proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \
- is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o
+ is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o brw_mutex.o
lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o
lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
diff --git a/lib/brw_mutex.c b/lib/brw_mutex.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..41984a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/brw_mutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#include <linux/brw_mutex.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
+int brw_mutex_init(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&brw->read_waitq);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
+ brw->read_ctr = alloc_percpu(long);
+ return brw->read_ctr ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+void brw_start_read(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ for (;;) {
+ bool done = false;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) {
+ __this_cpu_inc(*brw->read_ctr);
+ done = true;
+ }
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ if (likely(done))
+ break;
+
+ __wait_event(brw->read_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr));
+ }
+}
+
+void brw_end_read(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ this_cpu_dec(*brw->read_ctr);
+
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr)))
+ wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
+}
+
+static inline long brw_read_ctr(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ long sum = 0;
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ sum += per_cpu(*brw->read_ctr, cpu);
+
+ return sum;
+}
+
+void brw_start_write(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr);
+ synchronize_sched();
+ /*
+ * Thereafter brw_*_read() must see write_ctr != 0,
+ * and we should see the result of __this_cpu_inc().
+ */
+ wait_event(brw->write_waitq, brw_read_ctr(brw) == 0);
+}
+
+void brw_end_write(struct brw_mutex *brw)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->write_ctr))
+ wake_up_all(&brw->read_waitq);
+}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-15 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 19:09 [RFC PATCH 0/2] uprobes: register/unregister can race with fork Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-15 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 15:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-17 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-17 16:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 16:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 16:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 17:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 19:28 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 15:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 17:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 22:54 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 3:08 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25 14:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-26 12:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 13:22 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-26 14:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 15:23 ` mark_files_ro && sb_end_write Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 23:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 15:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-22 23:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use rcu_read_lock_sched Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 17:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 18:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 18:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 14:54 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 15:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 16:15 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 21:39 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:22 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 20:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:44 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 23:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 12:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 13:48 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-23 20:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-24 15:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 21:26 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-30 18:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41 ` [PATCH 0/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-01 15:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-01 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 " Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-07 17:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 19:17 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-08 13:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 1:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 1:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 13:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-08 21:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 23:41 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 12:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-10 0:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 18:27 ` [PATCH -mm] percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessari ly.fix Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-16 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-18 19:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-01 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-01 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: Use brw_mutex to fix register/unregister vs dup_mmap() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 7:03 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121015191018.GA4816@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).