public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Cotey <puff65537@bansheeslibrary.com>
To: Chad Williamson <chad@dahc.us>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: silicom: coding style fixes for bp_proc.c
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:38:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016053854.GA6665@elbert.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350297039-8166-1-git-send-email-chad@dahc.us>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:30:34AM -0500, Chad Williamson wrote:
> This patch set corrects many of the coding style issues detected by
> checkpatch.pl in bp_proc.c.
> 
> Chad Williamson (5):
>   staging: silicom: fix whitespace in bp_proc.c
>   staging: silicom: fix C99 comments in bp_proc.c
>   staging: silicom: remove parentheses from return statements in bg_proc.c
>   staging: silicom: remove unnecessary braces in bp_proc.c
>   staging: silicom: fix explicit intialization of procfs_dir in bp_proc.c
> 
>  drivers/staging/silicom/bp_proc.c | 82 +++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.12.2
> 

Looks good to me (and as soon as asrock support pulls their head out I'll run HW tests).

Regards,
  Daniel Cotey


      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-15 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15 10:30 [PATCH 0/5] staging: silicom: coding style fixes for bp_proc.c Chad Williamson
2012-10-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging: silicom: fix whitespace in bp_proc.c Chad Williamson
2012-10-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging: silicom: fix C99 comments " Chad Williamson
2012-10-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging: silicom: remove parentheses from return statements in bg_proc.c Chad Williamson
2012-10-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: silicom: remove unnecessary braces in bp_proc.c Chad Williamson
2012-10-15 10:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging: silicom: fix explicit intialization of procfs_dir " Chad Williamson
2012-10-16  5:38 ` Daniel Cotey [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121016053854.GA6665@elbert.example.com \
    --to=puff65537@bansheeslibrary.com \
    --cc=chad@dahc.us \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox