From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758347Ab2J2JDy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:03:54 -0400
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:59723 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756686Ab2J2JDv (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:03:51 -0400
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from 127.0.0.1 by antivirus2 (envelope-from <pneira@us.es>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.10 
 (clamdscan: 0.97.6/15516. spamassassin: 3.3.2.  
 Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):SA:0(-100.6/7.5):. 
 Processed in 1.830564 secs); 29 Oct 2012 09:03:49 -0000
X-Envelope-From: pneira@us.es
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:03:47 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use PTR_RET
Message-ID: <20121029090347.GA10521@1984>
References: <20121029004044.GA12982@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121029004044.GA12982@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:40:44AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Use PTR_RET rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
> 
> Generated by: coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci

Applied, thanks.

I have collapsed this patch and the one for ipv6/iptable_nat.c. They
are pretty small and description is the same.