From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to reserved memory area
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:30:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030163006.GA26404@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50900B1D02000078000A586C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Tue, Oct 30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.10.12 at 16:47, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> > This is a respin of 00e37bdb0113a98408de42db85be002f21dbffd3
> > ("xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to MMIO before kexec").
> >
> > Currently kexec in a PVonHVM guest fails with a triple fault because the
> > new kernel overwrites the shared info page. The exact failure depends on
> > the size of the kernel image. This patch moves the pfn from RAM into an
> > E820 reserved memory area.
>
> One thing that occurred to me only now: How is this relocation
> of the shared info going to help with the vCPU info placement?
> You can't undo this, nor can you re-register these areas to be
> put in a different location (of course, both of there could be
> implemented in the hypervisor). Yet the hypervisor writes to
> some of these areas' fields as much as it does write to the
> shared info structure itself.
Maybe the wording "move" is a bit misleading in this patch.
A single "move" of the actual pfn happens during boot, that is when a
PVonHVM enabled guest kernel does the XENMAPSPACE_shared_info operation.
It moves the pfn of the shared info page from the location the hvmloader
initially configured to this new pfn (0xfffff -> 0xfe700).
Another relocation does not happen at runtime, AFAIK.
The "move" which this patch does is more a source level move in the
sense that RESERVE_BRK (which is somewhere in the middle of RAM) is not
used anymore. Instead a pfn in an E820_Reserved area is used, see
xen-unstable changeset 26108:79185dcdf558 "hvmloader: Reserve
FE700000-FE800000 in physical memory map for guest use."
Olaf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 15:47 [PATCH v4] xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to reserved memory area Olaf Hering
2012-10-30 16:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 16:30 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2012-10-30 16:45 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 17:03 ` Olaf Hering
2012-10-31 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121030163006.GA26404@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox