public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to reserved memory area
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:30:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030163006.GA26404@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50900B1D02000078000A586C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Tue, Oct 30, Jan Beulich wrote:

> >>> On 30.10.12 at 16:47, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> > This is a respin of 00e37bdb0113a98408de42db85be002f21dbffd3
> > ("xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to MMIO before kexec").
> > 
> > Currently kexec in a PVonHVM guest fails with a triple fault because the
> > new kernel overwrites the shared info page. The exact failure depends on
> > the size of the kernel image. This patch moves the pfn from RAM into an
> > E820 reserved memory area.
> 
> One thing that occurred to me only now: How is this relocation
> of the shared info going to help with the vCPU info placement?
> You can't undo this, nor can you re-register these areas to be
> put in a different location (of course, both of there could be
> implemented in the hypervisor). Yet the hypervisor writes to
> some of these areas' fields as much as it does write to the
> shared info structure itself.

Maybe the wording "move" is a bit misleading in this patch. 

A single "move" of the actual pfn happens during boot, that is when a
PVonHVM enabled guest kernel does the XENMAPSPACE_shared_info operation.
It moves the pfn of the shared info page from the location the hvmloader
initially configured to this new pfn (0xfffff -> 0xfe700).
Another relocation does not happen at runtime, AFAIK.

The "move" which this patch does is more a source level move in the
sense that RESERVE_BRK (which is somewhere in the middle of RAM) is not
used anymore. Instead a pfn in an E820_Reserved area is used, see
xen-unstable changeset 26108:79185dcdf558 "hvmloader: Reserve
FE700000-FE800000 in physical memory map for guest use."


Olaf

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-30 15:47 [PATCH v4] xen PVonHVM: move shared_info to reserved memory area Olaf Hering
2012-10-30 16:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 16:30   ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2012-10-30 16:45     ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 17:03       ` Olaf Hering
2012-10-31  8:02         ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121030163006.GA26404@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox