From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965484Ab2J3SwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:37902 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934236Ab2J3SwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:49:11 +0300 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Nitin Gupta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: permit sleeping while in pool zs_malloc() Message-ID: <20121030184911.GA2454@swordfish> References: <20121030090319.GB5052@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> <20121030180439.GA3350@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121030180439.GA3350@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (10/30/12 11:04), Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:03:19PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > zram: permit sleeping while in pool zs_malloc() > > 2/2? Huh? Where is 1/2? > > I have a raft of patches from you, all out of order, and full of > responses from Nitin, and so, I really have no idea what should and > should not be applied here. > > So, I'm dropping them all. Please work with Nitin to get a series of > patches that are acceptable and resend them with the proper numbering. > those were two separate series. the first one: [PATCH 1/2] zram: factor-out zram_decompress_page() function [PATCH 2/2] zram: handle mem suffixes in disk size zram_sysfs parameter ACKed by Nitin. the second one [PATCH 2/2] zram: permit sleeping while in pool zs_malloc() [PATCH 1/2] zram: forbid IO operations from within zram_init_device() -- droppped by me. I'll resend first two and next time will make sure not to spam your box. sorry. -ss > thanks, > > greg k-h >