From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
Cc: Tekkaman Ninja <tekkamanninja@gmail.com>,
Harry Wei <harryxiyou@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Documentation: Chinese translation of Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers.txt
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:34:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121031213415.GB17305@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121031110619.GC3780@linaro.org>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:06:19PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> What's the best way of making sure that changes in the source document
> propagate to translated versions?
>
> It might be enough to put a note in the source document to remind people
> to check for the extistence of translated versions and CC the relevant
> translation maintianers with any patches affecting the source document.
What I was suggesting was even more light-weight. Just include at the
very beginning or the very end of the the file the last time the
translation was updated, and either the kernel version (i..e, v3.6) or
the git commit ID (i.e., df981d03eeff) that was used for the source
document.
That way, someone who reads the file will know how "fresh" the
document is, and the reader can do a "git log -p
Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers 1234567890abcd.." to see all of
the changes made to the file since the last time the translation was
updated.
People will inevitably remember to forget to notify the translation
maintainers, and as the number of translations go up, the more
workload we put on the everyone else. If we simply mark the
translation, then the translators can poll to refresh the document at
their leisure, or perhaps this allows anyone who is using the
translated documentation file and who has a reasonable command of
English to do the "git log -p ..." command and perhaps contribute a
patch to update the translation. So I think this approach would scale
much better.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 16:20 [PATCH]Documentation: Chinese translation of Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers.txt Tekkaman Ninja
2012-10-30 19:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-31 10:44 ` harryxiyou
2012-10-31 11:06 ` Dave Martin
2012-10-31 21:34 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-11-01 14:23 ` Dave Martin
2012-10-31 5:06 ` Dongsheng Song
2012-10-31 10:42 ` harryxiyou
2012-10-31 13:59 ` Ninja Tekkaman
2012-10-31 13:56 ` Ninja Tekkaman
2012-10-31 11:03 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121031213415.GB17305@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dave.martin@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harryxiyou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=tekkamanninja@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox