From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
Petr Matousek <pmatouse@redhat.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: setting up CDB filters in udev (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:18:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121105181809.GE19354@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121103145052.0da49071@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Hello, Alan.
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 02:50:52PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I proposed a way to implement the ultimately flexible solution (BPF) and
> > you shot it down because it was too complex. Alan is showing you with
> > multiple examples of why the flexibility would be useful (perhaps nobody
> > would use it, but the use cases _are_ there), and you are mostly
> > ignoring them.
>
> My feeling too - It feels to me like Tejun is trying to railroad a broken
> non-solution into the system without regards for anyone else and by
> simply dismissing any other input.
The only other use case brought up is allowing use of vendor-specific
commands while burning CDs. Given that the usual burning has been
working well enough for years now, I don't really think that's a
strong enough reason to add full BPF filtering to SG_IO. It's just
highly unusual thing to do and there isn't strong enough use case for
it.
To me, it feels like you guys are pushing a feature without strong
enough use case. So, I'm still pretty strongly against it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 15:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add back queue-private command filter Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: create an all-zero filter for scanners Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: add back command filter modification via sysfs Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-04 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable " Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-19 0:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-19 9:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <2007908429.13363375.1350637872646.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20121019201058.GP13370@google.com>
[not found] ` <5087E093.50700@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CAOS58YM5ZO9h0XUCNxV+6U3UzpeUen5ZuyqsNEUaJ81ux=QKvw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5088EC43.2010600@redhat.com>
2012-10-25 18:00 ` setting up CDB filters in udev (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs) Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 18:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-31 12:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-31 21:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-02 15:35 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 17:21 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 20:18 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 20:48 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 22:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 23:52 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 23:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03 0:19 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-03 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03 0:52 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 17:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-02 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03 13:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-03 14:50 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 11:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-05 18:18 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-11-05 20:12 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-05 20:17 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-05 18:26 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121105181809.GE19354@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kay@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmatouse@redhat.com \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).