From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@linux.com, pjt@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121106134831.GA969@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352207399-29497-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:09:57PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> This patch add the power aware scheduler knob into sysfs:
>
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> performance powersaving
>
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> powersaving
>
> The using sched policy is 'powersaving'. User can change the policy
> by commend 'echo':
> echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/current_sched_policy
>
> Power aware scheduling will has different behavior according to
> different policy:
>
> performance: the current scheduling behaviour, try to spread tasks
> on more CPU sockets or cores.
> powersaving: will shrink tasks into sched group until the group's
> nr_running is up to group_weight.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 21 +++++++
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 2 +
> include/linux/cpu.h | 2 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++
> 5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index 6943133..1909d3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -53,6 +53,27 @@ Description: Dynamic addition and removal of CPU's. This is not hotplug
> the system. Information writtento the file to remove CPU's
> is architecture specific.
>
> +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> + /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> +Date: Oct 2012
> +Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> +Description: CFS scheduler policy showing and setting interface.
> +
> + available_sched_policy shows there are 2 kinds of policy now:
> + performance and powersaving.
> + current_sched_policy shows current scheduler policy. And user
> + can change the policy by writing it.
> +
> + Policy decides that CFS scheduler how to distribute tasks onto
> + which CPU unit when tasks number less than LCPU number in system
> +
> + performance: try to spread tasks onto more CPU sockets,
> + more CPU cores.
> +
> + powersaving: try to shrink tasks onto same core or same CPU
> + until running task number beyond the LCPU number in the core
> + or socket.
> +
> What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/node
> Date: October 2009
> Contact: Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 6345294..5f6a573 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -330,4 +330,6 @@ void __init cpu_dev_init(void)
> panic("Failed to register CPU subsystem");
>
> cpu_dev_register_generic();
> +
> + create_sysfs_sched_policy_group(cpu_subsys.dev_root);
Are you sure you didn't just race with userspace, creating the sysfs
files after the device was created and announced to userspace?
If so, you need to fix this :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 13:09 [RFC PATCH 0/3] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:48 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-11-07 12:27 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-07 14:41 ` Greg KH
2012-11-08 14:40 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 15:20 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-07 13:03 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: power aware load balance, Alex Shi
2012-11-06 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-07 12:42 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-07 4:37 ` Preeti Murthy
2012-11-07 13:27 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-11 18:49 ` Preeti Murthy
2012-11-12 3:05 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121106134831.GA969@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox