From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752496Ab2KGIpi (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 03:45:38 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:29359 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751285Ab2KGIph (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 03:45:37 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,728,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="165419812" Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:47:51 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Shiraz Hashim , Viresh Kumar , Stephen Warren , Anmar Oueja , Grant Likely , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: iron out include ladder mistakes Message-ID: <20121107084751.GU24532@intel.com> References: <1352218863-2037-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1352218863-2037-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:21:03PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > +static inline int > +gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip, const char *pinctl_name, > + unsigned int pin_base, unsigned int npins) > +{ > +} Should you return some value above? Like -ENOSYS?