From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755539Ab2KHNrl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:47:41 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23658 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751069Ab2KHNrk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:47:40 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:48:05 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
        Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not
	block the readers unnecessarily
Message-ID: <20121108134805.GA23870@redhat.com>
References: <20121018162409.GA28504@redhat.com> <20121018163833.GK2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121018175747.GA30691@redhat.com> <20121019192838.GM2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210221910150.25995@file.rdu.redhat.com> <20121030184800.GA16129@redhat.com> <20121031194135.GA504@redhat.com> <20121031194158.GB504@redhat.com> <CA+55aFx0yyke6V1+wgMPBN4QZ0w=YoV7yBRqp0uy6aGKbcmC5g@mail.gmail.com> <20121102180606.GA13255@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121102180606.GA13255@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 11/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 11/01, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Other than that, I guess it looks ok.
>
> Great, please see v2.
>
> I am not sure I addressed Paul's concerns, so I guess I need his ack.

And now I have it, so I think the patch is ready.

Please see 1/1. No changes except I added Reviewed-by from Paul.

If it is too late for 3.7, then may be Andrew can pick it.

Oleg.