From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: otg: twl4030: Change TWL4030_MODULE_* ids to TWL_MODULE_*
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113110317.GG10951@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A22789.7070103@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 998 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:57:13AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 11:37 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > ok good. Unfortunately I have already sent this merge window's pull
> > request to Greg so I'd have to delay this until v3.9. If that's ok with
> > you, I can take it through my tree.
>
> I hoped that this can go with 3.8 since in 3.9 I'm planning to remove all of
> these TWL4030_MODULE_* defines which have TWL_MODULE_* counterpart.
> In this case I will introduce dummy defines to point to the correct place for
> the USB in 3.9 and we can get rid of the rest of these in 3.10. Oh well. This
> is going to take a bit longer than I have anticipated.
> I can't think of any other subsytem this can go through...
Let's ask if Greg could take this patch directly without going through
me.
Greg, would it be ok to take this single patch without going through me?
Or would you prefer if I made another tag just for this single patch ?
cheers
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-13 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 9:43 [PATCH] usb: otg: twl4030: Change TWL4030_MODULE_* ids to TWL_MODULE_* Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-13 9:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-11-13 10:28 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-13 10:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-11-13 10:57 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-13 11:03 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121113110317.GG10951@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox