From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
jonas.aberg@stericsson.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115105752.GC4398@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121115103528.GA21682@gmail.com>
On 10:35 Thu 15 Nov , Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>
> > On 10:04 Thu 15 Nov , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > This patchset supplies a new tool which measures boottime inclusive
> > > of bootloader involvement. It seems to be accurate and adds no
> > > latency to the booting of the system.
> > >
> > > In the first round of testing we booted the kernel 3 times each with
> > > boottime enabled and disabled. Actually, when it was disabled, the
> > > code was completely removed from the kernel source and the kernel was
> > > rebuilt. The difference between present & enabled and completely
> > > removed was very little indeed. In fact, averaging out the 3 runs of
> > > each, when boottime was enabled the system booted 4ms _faster_, go
> > > figure!
> > >
> > > Enabled Disabled
> > > 1st run 2.983093 2.985168
> > > 2nd run 2.973266 2.971801
> > > 3rd run 2.975402 2.987304
> > > Average 2.977254 2.981424 -0.004171 (-4ms)
> > >
> > >
> > > For the next round of testing, we delayed the bootloader for varying
> > > amounts of time, then started to remove key components from kernel
> > > functionality to see if the boottime system would pick-up on them.
> > >
> > > /* Hang around in the bootloader for a while. */
> > > $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/boottime/summary
> > > kernel: 42864 msecs
> > > total: 42864 msecs
> > > kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > > cpu1 system: 4% idle: 95% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > >
> > > /* Hang around in the bootloader for a smaller amount of time. */
> > > kernel: 12351 msecs
> > > total: 12351 msecs
> > > kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > > cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > >
> > > /* Instant boot. (1st run) */
> > > kernel: 7833 msecs
> > > total: 7833 msecs
> > > kernel: cpu0 system: 55% idle: 44% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > > cpu1 system: 3% idle: 96% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > >
> > > /* Instant boot. (2nd run) */
> > > kernel: 7817 msecs
> > > total: 7817 msecs
> > > kernel: cpu0 system: 53% idle: 46% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > > cpu1 system: 8% idle: 91% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > >
> > > /* Instant boot. (3rd run) */
> > > kernel: 7747 msecs
> > > total: 7747 msecs
> > > kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 42% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > > cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> > 7/8s? on a u9500 wow it's really slow
>
> No, this is a u8500.
>
> > I do 2/3s here
>
> Really? You installed this quick.
>
> Are you sure you did it correctly?
yes we spend less than 2s (~ 1.5s) in the bootloader
I measure it via scope
>
> Don't forget, this times from power-on to userspace.
yes
to the shell prompt
and gexbox 13s IIRC application
Best Regards,
J.
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 10:04 [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:16 ` Kyungmin Park
2012-11-15 11:25 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 17:31 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-20 16:16 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-29 20:35 ` Simon Glass
2012-11-30 8:21 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 13:52 ` Andrew Murray
2012-11-15 14:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: clksrc-dbx500-prcmu: Add boottime support Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-11-15 10:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121115105752.GC4398@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jonas.aberg@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).