From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] ftrace: Optimizing the function tracer
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:30:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115153036.550942394@goodmis.org> (raw)
In the past I've worked on tricks to make the function tracer a bit
faster. I've lowered the overhead by 18% which is quite an improvement.
Thus, instead of only taking 11x longer in the kernel, it takes 9x ;-)
Anyway, these are the latest patches to improve function tracing and
are pretty much good to go mainline. I just wanted to do one last
RFC post before pushing them forward.
-- Steve
These patches can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
rfc/function-preempt-only-v2
Head SHA1: bf9d25e084984439cb32c1fc7cb0f1936c95c51a
Steven Rostedt (8):
ftrace: Fix global function tracers that are not recursion safe
ftrace: Fix function tracing recursion self test
ftrace: Optimize the function tracer list loop
ftrace: Add context level recursion bit checking
tracing: Make the trace recursion bits into enums
tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks
ftrace: Use only the preempt version of function tracing
ring-buffer: User context bit recursion checking
----
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++--------
kernel/trace/trace.h | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 61 +++++-------------
kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 3 +-
5 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 15:30 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/8][RFC] ftrace: Fix global function tracers that are not recursion safe Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/8][RFC] ftrace: Fix function tracing recursion self test Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/8][RFC] ftrace: Optimize the function tracer list loop Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/8][RFC] ftrace: Add context level recursion bit checking Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 5/8][RFC] tracing: Make the trace recursion bits into enums Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 6/8][RFC] tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 7/8][RFC] ftrace: Use only the preempt version of function tracing Steven Rostedt
2012-11-15 15:30 ` [PATCH 8/8][RFC] ring-buffer: User context bit recursion checking Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121115153036.550942394@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox