From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754760Ab2KSU2G (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:28:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:53644 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754342Ab2KSU2E (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:28:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:28:00 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Bill Pemberton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/493] remove CONFIG_HOTPLUG as an option Message-ID: <20121119202800.GA9083@kroah.com> References: <1353112043-11800-1-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu> <20121119195555.GA21922@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20121119200149.GA31589@kroah.com> <2170877.01mKLSMGf6@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2170877.01mKLSMGf6@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:27:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 19, 2012 12:01:49 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55:56AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:19:10PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is no longer an optional setting. In order to remove > > > > it as on option code paths that check CONFIG_HOTPLUG will removed > > > > along with the attributes __devexit_p, __devexit, __devinitconst, and > > > > __devinitdata. > > > > > > > > I'll save the list from the mailbomb of this huge patchset. The > > > > patches themselves are going to Greg KH for the driver core tree. > > > > > > > > > > _iff_ we are going to do this I'd prefer pushing input pieces through my > > > tree to limit clashes with other work. > > > > That's fine with me. I'll ignore any drivers/input/ patches then, is > > that ok? > > Please do the same for PM/ACPI. Ok, will do. > Do I need to pull anything for those patches to compile without problems? Nope, it's just the removal of a symbol, that for 3.7, is defined away to be an empty string anyway :) thanks, greg k-h