public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:30:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121122173020.GA8473@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121122153621.452CA3E129E@localhost>

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:36:21PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

> Hmm... I've not tried it with assigned-address. I tried with two sibling
> platform devices using just the 'reg' property. That the kernel will
> complain about. For powerpc-only, the patch I posted allows the device
> to get registered anyway even though the range incorrectly overlaps.

My second example was done with the reg property..

                gpio0: gpio@10100 {
                        compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio";
                        #gpio-cells = <2>;
                        gpio-controller;
                        reg = <0x10100 0x40>;
                }
                chip_cfg@0 {
                        compatible = "orc,chip_config";
                        // Doubles up on gpio0
                        reg = <0x10100 0x4>;
                };


f1010100-f101013f : /internal@f1000000/gpio@10100
  f1010100-f1010103 : /internal@f1000000/chip_cfg@0

What did you try? Maybe order matters?

Regards,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-22 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-21  7:24 [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-21 15:51 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 16:05   ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 17:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-21 18:07     ` Grant Likely
2012-11-21 18:14       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-22 15:36         ` Grant Likely
2012-11-22 17:30           ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2012-11-26 14:30             ` Grant Likely
2012-11-26 15:28             ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121122173020.GA8473@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox