From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: _register() should always do register_for_each_vma(true)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121123202817.GA18907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121123202741.GA18858@redhat.com>
To support the filtering uprobe_register() should do
register_for_each_vma(true) every time the new consumer comes,
we need to install the previously nacked breakpoints.
Note:
- uprobes_mutex[] should die, what is actually protects is
alloc_uprobe().
- UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER should die too, obviously it can't work
unless uprobe has a single consumer. The consumer should
serialize with _register/_unregister itself. Or this flag
should live in uprobe_consumer->state.
- Perhaps we can do some optimizations later. For example, if
filter_chain() never returns false uprobe can record this
fact and avoid the unnecessary register_for_each_vma().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 7c98671..c80507d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -482,16 +482,12 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
up_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
}
-/* Returns the previous consumer */
-static struct uprobe_consumer *
-consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+static void consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
uc->next = uprobe->consumers;
uprobe->consumers = uc;
up_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
-
- return uc->next;
}
/*
@@ -820,9 +816,15 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
return err;
}
-static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
- return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
+ int err;
+
+ consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
+ err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
+ if (!err) /* TODO: pointless unless the first consumer */
+ set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
+ return err;
}
static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
@@ -867,21 +869,14 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
return -EINVAL;
- ret = 0;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
mutex_lock(uprobes_hash(inode));
uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
-
- if (!uprobe) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- } else if (!consumer_add(uprobe, uc)) {
- ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe);
- if (ret) {
+ if (uprobe) {
+ ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe, uc);
+ if (ret)
__uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
- } else {
- set_bit(UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, &uprobe->flags);
- }
}
-
mutex_unlock(uprobes_hash(inode));
if (uprobe)
put_uprobe(uprobe);
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-23 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 20:27 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister preparations for filtering Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Move __set_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) into alloc_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 5:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Kill the "uprobe != NULL" check in uprobe_unregister() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 6:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Kill the pointless inode/uc checks in register/unregister Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 6:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-13 10:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 13:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-13 14:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 14:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Kill uprobe_consumer->filter() Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 12:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce filter_chain() Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-24 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-10 12:04 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-23 20:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: _unregister() should always do register_for_each_vma(false) Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-23 20:28 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-12-13 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: _register() should always do register_for_each_vma(true) Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121123202817.GA18907@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).