From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758397Ab2K0JBi (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 04:01:38 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:54289 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753549Ab2K0JBh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 04:01:37 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: new warnings from partial __devexit removal Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:01:33 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Bill Pemberton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <201211262038.32276.arnd@arndb.de> <20121126225056.GB28995@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20121126225056.GB28995@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201211270901.33531.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Guf0wf2xiEO4+hTg6WIg16aT6Nsyp92Oobh45IEp5yv todqQ2MO03YaHYlzbOma+6DfiHVBGWV6lCbub0pNNRuW3GCb4I gFI7r/5gJC94SN6MpMxmimXGGl+x5wcKbIKlYK3Qh7ZNgZZZ7C zIjsDFbPHdnEE3UVpjWScYqYcL1dPzBhgVgvnwTV4V40pc3zDx mdF+6F+vs3EC68Lbb0/FyxB/xx6HvNTQLDxNdIG3Ar3CAuY0q8 hH0nw41TW8VrjVwYn1hSsDJG6EPlnyGXoUauvZ3lesXAt4ZO/V HImz/ahKTJijIqmsOwO9Yl4DttjfU+cAALnCRk0wy36C8tqAne XhtSDEOwIrbD8iH+Mr68= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 26 November 2012, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:38:32PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This is probably known and fixed already, but in case it's not, let me just > > mention that I saw two new warnings with ARM allyesconfig about a > > __devexit being removed but the __devexit_p() still being there: > > > > drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:1000:12: error: 'xuartps_remove' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > drivers/usb/gadget/mv_udc_core.c:2131:12: error: 'mv_udc_remove' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > What platform has -Werror=unused-function set? My test script to check if any new warnings have come in sets -Werror. I have a git branch that has workarounds for all known gcc warnings on ARM, so one of my tests after merging stuff is to pull that one into my for-next branch and build all defconfigs and all{yes,no,mod}config. Arnd