From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751177Ab2K1CE6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:04:58 -0500 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:45856 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943Ab2K1CE5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:04:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:04:43 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Li Zhong , Gilad.Ben-Yossef.gilad@benyossef.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] context_tracking: New context tracking susbsystem Message-ID: <20121128020443.GW2474@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1354041205-6989-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20121128005942.GV2474@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1354067438.6276.92.camel@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1354067438.6276.92.camel@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12112802-5806-0000-0000-00001C3FF36A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:50:38PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 16:59 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:33:25PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Create a new subsystem that probes on kernel boundaries > > > to keep track of the transitions between level contexts > > > with two basic initial contexts: user or kernel. > > > > > > This is an abstraction of some RCU code that use such tracking > > > to implement its userspace extended quiescent state. > > > > > > We need to pull this up from RCU into this new level of indirection > > > because this tracking is also going to be used to implement an "on > > > demand" generic virtual cputime accounting. A necessary step to > > > shutdown the tick while still accounting the cputime. > > > > I have queued this, and if it passes tests and inspection will try > > pushing it for 3.8. > > > > You can add my Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt if you > like. Very happy to do so! ;-) Thanx, Paul