From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755499Ab2LCRLe (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:11:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:38919 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754670Ab2LCRLc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:11:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:11:26 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Lee Schermerhorn , Christoph Lameter , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1 Message-ID: <20121203171126.GA18394@gmail.com> References: <1354473824-19229-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> <50BCCAA3.6060604@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50BCCAA3.6060604@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rik van Riel wrote: > >Rik van Riel (1): > > sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement > > Where did the TLB flush optimizations go? :) They are still very much there, unchanged for a long time and acked by everyone - I thought I'd spare a few electrons by not doing a 60+ patches full resend. Here is how it looks like in the full diffstat: Rik van Riel (6): mm/generic: Only flush the local TLB in ptep_set_access_flags() x86/mm: Only do a local tlb flush in ptep_set_access_flags() x86/mm: Introduce pte_accessible() mm: Only flush the TLB when clearing an accessible pte x86/mm: Completely drop the TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags() sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement I'm really fond of these btw., they make a real difference. Thanks, Ingo