From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754057Ab2LEQpa (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:45:30 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49496 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752538Ab2LEQp2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:45:28 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:44:10 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken
Message-ID: <20121205164410.GD28556@liondog.tnic>
Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
References: <20121205070901.GA12123@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
 <20121205142935.GA12119@liondog.tnic>
 <20121205152756.5afec12c@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
 <20121205163905.GA18522@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121205163905.GA18522@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:39:05PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thanks to Borislav Petkov for his reply, too -
> however I'd like to state that given this lack of tooling/attention
> writing a mail in this more special manner was fully justified IMPHO.

Ok, you've stated more than clearly that you're pissed with the current
situation - I think we all got that.

Now, how do you suggest we change it constructively and how are you
willing to help?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.