From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932634Ab2LFOEg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:04:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:37573 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932126Ab2LFOEe (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:04:34 -0500 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Remove SPI_BUFSIZ restriction on spi_write_then_read() To: Mark Brown Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20121206053732.GD10867@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1354420465-29315-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20121206000026.A620D3E0E22@localhost> <20121206053732.GD10867@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:04:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20121206140427.8E5673E089D@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:37:33 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:00:26AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > > > Looks good to me. Probably 3.9 material though. > > > Acked-by: Grant Likely > > Hrm, I'd be inclined to apply it now - it's isolated enough that it can > be reverted if it explodes and we have the -rc cycle to notice any > problems. Alright, applied. I've also merged in your spi-next tree. Let me know if that causes problems because it needs to be rebased. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.