From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932755Ab2LGLLD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:11:03 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:28405 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755066Ab2LGLLA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:11:00 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,236,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="177449962" Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:14:15 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add Haswell LPSS devices to acpi_platform_device_ids list Message-ID: <20121207111415.GH23611@intel.com> References: <1354874882-1162-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20121207110126.53cd97e7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121207110126.53cd97e7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:08:02 +0200 > Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented > > as platform devices > > What about the bus heirarchy ? What about making sure they appear in the > PCI resource heirarchy so we don't mash them up if we reassign or > allocate other resources on the bus ? I'm not sure if I understand what you mean here. We put them in hierarchy if the parent ACPI node has also a physical device bound to it (like PCIe root port).