From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "\"Jan H. Schönherr\"" <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:04:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207150448.GC20369@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C1D758.1080007@cs.tu-berlin.de>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:47:36PM +0100, "Jan H. Schönherr" wrote:
> Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800
> >> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll
> >>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not
> >>> delayed until 3.9?
> >>
> >> It would be better to do things in the other order.
> >>
> >> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause
> >> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which
> >> require more thought and testing and possible fixups.
> >
> > Fine by me. Jan?
>
> No problem.
>
> I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some
> more eyeballs.
>
> Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider
> these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't
> have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes.
>
>
> Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the
> queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about
> _when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a
> version rebased on top of Joe's changes?
You are correct, I'll end up queuing these up to my tree when 3.8-rc1 is
out, they will live in linux-next until 3.8-final is out, and then go to
Linus for 3.9-rc1. Right now, my trees are frozen due to the merge
window about to open up. Your patience is appreciated.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 17:05 [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] printk: use saved timestamp for temporarily buffered message Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] printk: reclaim cont buffer immediately for fully printed messages Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] printk: do not add unnecessary newlines to the continuation buffer Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] printk: reuse reclaimed continuation buffer immediately Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] printk: move wake_klogd-check out of the loop Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] printk: let cont_print_text() reuse existing code Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] printk: refactor locking in console_unlock() Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] printk: retain unknown log-level until cont_add()/log_store() Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] printk: track previously logged message in log_store() Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] printk: avoid glitches in console output Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] printk: encode formatting in message flags Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] printk: drop now useless tracking of previous " Jan H. Schönherr
2012-12-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] printk: refactor continuation buffer handling Jan H. Schönherr
[not found] ` <20121206133907.37c255e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2012-12-06 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups Joe Perches
[not found] ` <20121206161943.78633125.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2012-12-07 2:51 ` Joe Perches
2012-12-07 11:47 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-12-07 15:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-12-07 15:42 ` Joe Perches
2012-12-07 15:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121207150448.GC20369@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox