From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:12:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121210164225.GC6348@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354875832-9700-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Hi Mel, Ingo,
Here are the results of running autonumabenchmark on a 64 core, 8 node
machine. Has six 32GB nodes and two 64 GB nodes.
KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc8
Testcase: Min Max Avg
numa01: 1475.37 1615.39 1555.24
numa01_HARD_BIND: 900.42 1244.00 993.30
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2835.44 5067.22 3634.86
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 918.51 1384.21 1121.17
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 599.58 1178.26 792.73
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1841.33 2237.34 1988.95
numa02: 126.95 188.31 147.04
numa02_HARD_BIND: 26.05 29.17 26.94
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 341.10 369.37 349.10
numa02_SMT: 144.32 922.65 386.43
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 26.61 170.71 101.98
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 288.12 456.45 325.26
KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc8-tip_master+(December 7th Snapshot)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 2927.89 3217.56 3103.21 -49.88%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 2653.09 5964.23 3431.35 -71.05%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 3567.03 3933.18 3811.91 -4.64%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 1801.80 2339.16 1980.96 -43.40%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 1705.84 2110.06 1913.64 -58.57%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 2266.12 2540.61 2376.67 -16.31%
numa02: 179.26 358.03 264.19 -44.34%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 26.07 29.38 27.70 -2.74%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 337.99 347.95 343.51 1.63%
numa02_SMT: 93.65 402.58 213.15 81.29%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 91.19 140.47 116.26 -12.28%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 289.03 299.57 297.01 9.51%
KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc6-mel_auto_balance(mm-balancenuma-v10r3)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 1536.93 1819.85 1694.54 -8.22%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 909.67 1145.32 1055.57 -5.90%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2882.07 3287.24 2976.89 22.10%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 995.79 4845.27 1905.85 -41.17%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 582.36 818.11 655.18 20.99%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1790.91 1927.90 1868.49 6.45%
numa02: 131.53 287.93 209.15 -29.70%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 25.68 31.90 27.66 -2.60%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 341.09 401.37 353.84 -1.34%
numa02_SMT: 156.61 2036.63 731.97 -47.21%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 25.10 196.60 79.72 27.92%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 294.22 1801.59 824.41 -60.55%
KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc6-autonuma+(mm-autonuma-v28fastr4-mels-rebase)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 1596.13 1715.34 1649.44 -5.71%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 920.75 1127.86 1012.50 -1.90%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2858.79 3146.74 2977.16 22.09%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 250.55 374.27 290.12 286.45%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 572.29 712.74 630.62 25.71%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1835.94 2401.04 2011.20 -1.11%
numa02: 33.93 104.80 50.99 188.37%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 25.94 27.51 26.42 1.97%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 334.57 349.51 341.23 2.31%
numa02_SMT: 43.72 114.82 62.41 519.18%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 34.98 45.61 42.07 142.41%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 284.57 310.62 298.51 8.96%
Avg refers to mean of 5 iterations of autonuma-benchmark.
%Change refers to percentage change from 3.7-rc8
Please do let me know if you have questions/suggestions.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-10 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 10:23 [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 01/49] x86: mm: only do a local tlb flush in ptep_set_access_flags() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/49] x86: mm: drop TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/49] mm,generic: only flush the local TLB in ptep_set_access_flags Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/49] x86/mm: Introduce pte_accessible() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/49] mm: Only flush the TLB when clearing an accessible pte Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/49] mm: Count the number of pages affected in change_protection() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 07/49] mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection() users Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 08/49] mm: compaction: Move migration fail/success stats to migrate.c Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 09/49] mm: migrate: Add a tracepoint for migrate_pages Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 10/49] mm: compaction: Add scanned and isolated counters for compaction Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 11/49] mm: numa: define _PAGE_NUMA Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 12/49] mm: numa: pte_numa() and pmd_numa() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 13/49] mm: numa: Support NUMA hinting page faults from gup/gup_fast Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 14/49] mm: numa: split_huge_page: transfer the NUMA type from the pmd to the pte Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 15/49] mm: numa: Create basic numa page hinting infrastructure Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 16/49] mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 17/49] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_NOOP Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 18/49] mm: mempolicy: Check for misplaced page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 19/49] mm: migrate: Introduce migrate_misplaced_page() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 20/49] mm: migrate: Drop the misplaced pages reference count if the target node is full Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 21/49] mm: mempolicy: Use _PAGE_NUMA to migrate pages Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 22/49] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_LAZY Mel Gorman
2013-01-05 5:18 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-07 15:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 23/49] mm: mempolicy: Implement change_prot_numa() in terms of change_protection() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 24/49] mm: mempolicy: Hide MPOL_NOOP and MPOL_MF_LAZY from userspace for now Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 11:56 ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 26/49] mm: sched: numa: Implement constant, per task Working Set Sampling (WSS) rate Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 27/49] sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual memory ranges Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 28/49] mm: sched: numa: Implement slow start for working set sampling Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 29/49] mm: numa: Add pte updates, hinting and migration stats Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 11:42 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-07 15:29 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 30/49] mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 31/49] mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 32/49] mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 33/49] mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 34/49] mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 35/49] sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 36/49] mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 37/49] mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 38/49] mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 39/49] mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task<->node relationships Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 40/49] mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 41/49] mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 42/49] mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 43/49] mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 44/49] mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20130105084229.GA3208@hacker.(null)>
2013-01-07 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 45/49] mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 46/49] mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 47/49] mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 48/49] mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 49/49] mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 11:01 ` [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-09 20:36 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-09 21:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-12-10 8:44 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-10 5:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 6:28 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 12:44 ` [PATCH] sched: Fix task_numa_fault() + KSM crash Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 13:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 8:46 ` [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Mel Gorman
2012-12-10 12:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 11:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 15:24 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11 1:02 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-11 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-11 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-17 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 16:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2012-12-10 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 23:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 23:40 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 13:21 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121210164225.GC6348@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkml.alex@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).