From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751404Ab2LJWVY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:21:24 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:49313 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750823Ab2LJWVX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:21:23 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:21:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Viresh Kumar , vinod.koul@intel.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, spear-devel@list.st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com References: <3100e691db3f94c22afd98b609a1568d7e70dfe7.1350360935.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <169edae67b9a051ca7448e5b62c3cd2c5c1db470.1350360935.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <201212102208.52347.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201212102208.52347.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212102221.06614.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:HPl2uzHiapTtHOBYDoKiVryhMPAZzmvgSYcTM6QVZfK TnQkn0Y4Iib15KuR47PQujtCm9Q/bR6r/LgrnONAicF0MQYxBv CEBxCX/J3NM5BhiHebHj/JrxHtzS4KyoDtOZZUsfJnnEKTjnUm wHdeEoLsKG+pQjmElEw7ePuH0nllSaWiZro92S6e6o3SiWO4FL iuL3qVPp8sRhImHlqgrCZI0oRH8AEUnAvvzmAw9bWiC67vBLp7 d1dPZIqo5C1eGCIyAkXTbwVI6hjUIh/1Wjnf31JjW6GSqU1PYd nvYBDaMsfgTh+pvDDbgfmoP6B+A0qcIyGc1Qt4ewsPp3YNeB6g SGNCEs4P+sL4XsEAydKM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 10 December 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The build bug is not the problem however, but the abuse of the > API is. Andy, are you sure you understood what this does when > you gave you Reviewed-by comment? > Ah, I just saw that Andy had the right intuition when commenting on it at first, but Viresh managed to convince him otherwise, and appearently neither had followed the discussion about the dmaengine bindings... Arnd