From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754087Ab2LKQwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:52:22 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:62275 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753647Ab2LKQwV (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:52:21 -0500 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add Lynxpoint chipset gpio driver. To: Mathias Nyman Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <50C71BC3.2090006@linux.intel.com> References: <1354888899-21907-1-git-send-email-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> <1354888899-21907-2-git-send-email-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> <20121210230749.7820F3E081F@localhost> <50C71BC3.2090006@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:52:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20121211165207.C30423E0C3E@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:40:51 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 12/11/2012 01:07 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:01:39 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > >> Add gpio support for Intel Lynxpoint chipset. > >> Lynxpoint supports 94 gpio pins which can generate interrupts. > >> Driver will fail requests for pins that are marked as owned by ACPI, or > >> set in an alternate mode (non-gpio). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman > >> --- > >> +static void lp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio, int value) > >> +{ > >> + struct lp_gpio *lg = container_of(chip, struct lp_gpio, chip); > >> + unsigned long reg = gpio_reg(chip, gpio, LP_CONFIG1); > >> + unsigned long flags; > >> + > >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lg->lock, flags); > >> + > >> + if (value) > >> + outl(inl(reg) | OUT_LVL_BIT, reg); > >> + else > >> + outl(inl(reg)& ~OUT_LVL_BIT, reg); > >> + > >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lg->lock, flags); > >> +} > > > > A *lot* of drivers implement their own GPIO ops like this, and they all > > end up looking the same. Please take a look at > > drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c and see if you can use the stock operations > > provided there. > > > > g. > > > > Look quite similar but turns out the only potential generic ones which > could be used are the bgpio_set() and bgpio_get() funtions. Using them > would require custom pin2mask, write_reg, read_reg, etc functions. > bgpio_set_direction You would need new write_reg and read_reg, but they'd just become part of the library. Ah, but I see now that each GPIO has a separate register, and not a bitmask for multiple gpio lines. Fair enough. g.