From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.8
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:59:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121213165904.GA18574@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyZ2kAQPmZSv_sfHDAR1gusOxO22TRX-kqSim-cZrMscw@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > I could write the patch to completely invert the
> > exclude_guest logic -- make it include_guest. That breaks
> > all existing perf binaries as well - just a different syntax
> > that gets broken. That regression is acceptable?
>
> It's not a regression since THAT CODE NEVER WORKED, for
> chissake! The case of people actually profiling into virtual
> machines crashes the running VMs, as you say. There's no way
> in hell we can call it a regression to say "you now have to
> use a flag if you profile a load with virtualization", since
> there wasn't any working case to begin with.
Correct.
::include_guest looks like the more logical flag direction to
use in any case.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-13 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-11 9:09 [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.8 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 3:02 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 3:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 3:16 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 3:25 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 3:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 3:43 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 3:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 4:31 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 14:30 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 14:38 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 16:24 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 16:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-12-13 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-17 4:43 ` David Ahern
2012-12-22 19:22 ` David Ahern
2012-12-23 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-13 17:30 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 19:12 ` David Ahern
2012-12-13 7:48 ` [PATCH] Revert "perf: Require exclude_guest to use PEBS - kernel side enforcement" Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20121217102000.GE11016@redhat.com>
2012-12-22 19:30 ` [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.8 David Ahern
2012-12-23 9:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-23 23:17 ` David Ahern
2012-12-24 10:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-12-13 17:04 ` [PATCH] x86: fix perf build with uclibc toolchains Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121213165904.GA18574@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).