From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754656Ab2LSJqC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:46:02 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:39272 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387Ab2LSJpy (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:45:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:45:52 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Luciano Coelho , svenkatr@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org, lrg@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Ujfalusi , Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc Message-ID: <20121219094552.GN4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1352968293.10872.51.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <20121218095450.GB27751@arwen.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121218095450.GB27751@arwen.pp.htv.fi> X-Cookie: Your domestic life may be harmonious. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:54:50AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > damn, this is still part of our v3.7-rc kernel. Original commit was done > with no testing whatsoever and caused a big regression to (at least) > TI's WiFi driver which depend on SDIO to function. > Too bad things break and even when reported nobody gives a rat's *** > about them :-s I guess it's going to be even more of an issue going forward given the recent events but FWIW it was always very unusual to see any review of any TWL patches, the PMIC appeared to have been rather abandoned so the only way of getting any testing was to put stuff in -next and hope. Mind you, if there is an issue it doesn't seem that serious given that it took at least one kernel release before anyone noticed and even when they did you're the first person who bothered to respond... --WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0YzJAAoJELSic+t+oim9EhsQAJV7Os7mUXx2BCO08e8p8ETH Ramjq8oCkU3lMO8ksvcLmtLjm8XpSdbzE3D0xrzuUIYobd+XmJL9iBrvoaZFQayh j1VooLdhelX38bMTJXxoEj+vTBGPh8tPDAvoxnUXEio37swYO7p8SUUBIRLvQuJS 98tuCzvGUTLvSlR2RdtJWdR/CITptqeQaxfAeDbTUg22sF92jxAeuXH/V7ZqKVKy TjXh+JdQNwkNz5aTkFEqbuZvTbuuc9YgTHf/o4PPAokuk0wKGcg8131jok+w0CHi lBaRaba3WVuQeaZ2rNWogaV59HPtw5G9eUn6OHhTnKfH5DjA3oBuVnxCD3Ts8uCe LOBChb4m3/IoY+X+vjFZPPoMraR1tShkMiuYDRzIOzp1UkhgX+4jiOS/EhUgzV7H vVLqzm9JXO7Q/Blg/AZ1RYB8qJevDaTq0vDMEwvZFzIuQIMpN3mWzhxrms3dOIJJ 0UM1nQu4qoXsgjpLVim27/ywJUn64LiPG8t0LsdRWoTQGvzK+/DoymdrVFDTQnb1 EPPZDYTKTpqxPeMTGSu5Fm34Hiq8QUVTLMsyLKe6GtaJFbUpt7ngSTEtV8HG5MuB K642ZaUMKsnlcdH0J/vPTMx1NkQm+Rj7KbQ5Bh4O6NTzt2pTryq8k17GWXRkqw+J pbNC4tNQ0GJnKpVuy3eB =vHkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H--