From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751337Ab2LTPLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:11:11 -0500 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:55140 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913Ab2LTPLH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:11:07 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+Pcug0ElEWum6e8ZLbyEvI Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:10:59 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8 Message-ID: <20121220151059.GU4989@atomide.com> References: <20121218065502.GA12865@quad.lixom.net> <50D08547.8040405@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <50D08547.8040405@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Maxime Ripard [121218 07:08]: > Hi Olof, > > Le 18/12/2012 07:55, Olof Johansson a écrit : > > Maxime Ripard (1): > > ARM: sunxi: Change device tree naming scheme for sunxi > > There's something odd about this one (commit 68136b10). The patch that > you seem to have applied differs from the one I sent. The DTs files > appears to have not been renamed, while in the patch I sent > (http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137105.html), > it's the case. > > Do you know what happened here? What can we do to fix that? Looks like that's trivial to fix as needed, no need to rebuild the branch to fix that AFAIK. The fix can be done once Olof is available online again. Linus, I suggest that you go ahead and pull this if there are no other issues with this branch. Regards, Tony