From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751852Ab2LTS3G (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:29:06 -0500 Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:18317 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875Ab2LTS3B (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:29:01 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18GLcYWB/83fc6OHKkRhN74 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:28:36 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Linus Walleij Cc: Loic Pallardy , arm@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , Janusz Krzysztofik , Omar Ramirez Luna , Loic PALLARDY , Arnd Bergmann , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Mark Brown , Dom Cobley , Wim Van Sebroeck , Suman Anna , Juan Gutierrez , Felipe Contreras , Tejun Heo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux , Omar Ramirez Luna Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers: mailbox: framework creation Message-ID: <20121220182835.GB21056@atomide.com> References: <1355836212-17956-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy-ext@stericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Walleij [121220 10:19]: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy > wrote: > > > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate > > with some coprocessors. > > Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a > > generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox. > > I like this patch series so you have my Acked-by. > > Since it's a new subsystem and affects a few ARM architectures can > we merge this into the ARM SoC tree once we have consensus, > so we get some rotation in linux-next that way? Yes good idea. > Olof/Arnd? I suggest we set up an immutable branch against v3.8-rc1 when it's out with only these patches in it. Then we can all merge it in as needed. Maybe Arnd or Olof can set up the branch? FYI, looks like I need to merge in this branch too to avoid build errors with remoteproc enabled once I flip on the multiplatform support for omap2+. Regards, Tony