From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752500Ab2LTTd6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:33:58 -0500 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:14045 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796Ab2LTTdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:33:52 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX198FRVoQFEefgjNS6sH+2No Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:33:25 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Olof Johansson Cc: Linus Walleij , Loic Pallardy , arm@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , Janusz Krzysztofik , Omar Ramirez Luna , Loic PALLARDY , Arnd Bergmann , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Mark Brown , Dom Cobley , Wim Van Sebroeck , Suman Anna , Juan Gutierrez , Felipe Contreras , Tejun Heo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux , Omar Ramirez Luna Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers: mailbox: framework creation Message-ID: <20121220193325.GH21056@atomide.com> References: <1355836212-17956-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy-ext@stericsson.com> <20121220182835.GB21056@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Olof Johansson [121220 11:22]: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Linus Walleij [121220 10:19]: > >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy > >> wrote: > >> > >> > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate > >> > with some coprocessors. > >> > Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a > >> > generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox. > >> > >> I like this patch series so you have my Acked-by. > >> > >> Since it's a new subsystem and affects a few ARM architectures can > >> we merge this into the ARM SoC tree once we have consensus, > >> so we get some rotation in linux-next that way? > > > > Yes good idea. > > > >> Olof/Arnd? > > > > I suggest we set up an immutable branch against > > v3.8-rc1 when it's out with only these patches in it. > > Then we can all merge it in as needed. Maybe Arnd or > > Olof can set up the branch? > > I haven't reviewed the patches yet, but this flow sounds reasonable to me. OK cool. > > FYI, looks like I need to merge in this branch too to > > avoid build errors with remoteproc enabled once I flip > > on the multiplatform support for omap2+. > > While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make > remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to > reduce dependencies a little? Either way works, but it'd be nice to > keep them independent if we can. Yes I'll update the omap multiplat fixups patch I posted yesterday. I noticed it only after running make randconfig for a while. Regards, Tony