linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Ensure that kernel_init_freeable() is not inlined into non __init code
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:20:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121221072056.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356072944-23800-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Commit d6b2123802d "make sure that we always have a return path from
> kernel_execve()" reshuffled kernel_init()/init_post() to ensure that
> kernel_execve() has a caller to return to.
> 
> It removed __init annotation for kernel_init() and introduced/calls a
> new routine kernel_init_freeable(). Latter however is inlined by any
> reasonable compiler (ARC gcc 4.4 in this case), causing slight code
> bloat.

Interesting...  I assumed that explicitly set different section would be
enough, but I'd been wrong (or the original noinline would've been pointless,
now that I think of it).  Consider it ACKed; I can pick it through signal.git,
and while it's not urgent I'd send it to Linus after -rc1, with Cc: stable.
Or you can send it to him yourself with my usual Acked-by - up to you.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-21  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-21  6:55 [PATCH RESEND] Ensure that kernel_init_freeable() is not inlined into non __init code Vineet Gupta
2012-12-21  7:20 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-12-21  7:23   ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-26  4:56     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121221072056.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).