linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] pidns: Wait in zap_pid_ns_processes until pid_ns->nr_hashed == 1
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:31:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121221153152.GA17250@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121221150238.GA16003@redhat.com>

On 12/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Once again, the parent namespace injects the task T after ns->reaper
> sees nr_hashed == 1 and returns. Suppose that reaper's parent does
> do_wait() and free_pidmap() clears the bit == 1.
>
> Now, what if T doesn't exit but forks? We must not re-create the
> task with pid_nr == 1 in the dead namespace. Normally this can't
> happen, RESERVED_PIDS logic in alloc_pidmap() saves us. But it
> seems that we need
>
> 	- .extra1 = &zero,
> 	+ .extra1 = &one,
>
> in pid_ns_ctl_table.

Oh, and another problem, or I am totally confused.

T forks and creates the child C1. C1 creates C2. What if C1 exits?
It will try to reparent C2 to the dead/freed ns->child_reaper.

In short. We shouldn't allow alloc_pid() if ns->child_reaper is dying,
I think. nr_hashed == -1 doesn't really work.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-21 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-16 16:32 [REVIEW][PATCH 0/11] pid namespace cleanups and enhancements Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-16 16:35 ` [PATCH 01/11] procfs: Use the proc generic infrastructure for proc/self Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 02/11] procfs: Don't cache a pid in the root inode Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  1:07     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 03/11] pidns: Capture the user namespace and filter ns_last_pid Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  1:26     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 04/11] pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:02     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 05/11] pidns: Make the pidns proc mount/umount logic obvious Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19 11:02     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 06/11] pidns: Don't allow new processes in a dead pid namespace Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:17     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 07/11] pidns: Wait in zap_pid_ns_processes until pid_ns->nr_hashed == 1 Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:24     ` Gao feng
2012-12-19 18:47     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-21  1:19       ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-21 14:11         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-21 15:02           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-21 15:31             ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-12-21 18:42               ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-21 18:33           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 08/11] pidns: Deny strange cases when creating pid namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:25     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 09/11] pidns: Add setns support Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-19  9:11     ` Gao feng
2012-11-19  9:27       ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:36     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 10/11] pidns: Consolidate initialzation of special init task state Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:56     ` Gao feng
2012-11-16 16:35   ` [PATCH 11/11] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Eric W. Biederman
2012-11-21  2:55     ` Gao feng
2012-12-19 18:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-21  1:43       ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-21 15:49         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-21 17:51           ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-12-21 19:24             ` Rob Landley
2012-12-21 22:58               ` namespace documentation Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121221153152.GA17250@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).