From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753777Ab2LYIhI (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:37:08 -0500 Received: from nm25-vm4.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.177.124]:47448 "EHLO nm25-vm4.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753688Ab2LYIhG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:37:06 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 377 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:37:05 EST X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 767927.61421.bm@smtp118.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: WhvlSz0VM1l3V_kS_XnR_qNxfCfXG3PPiy24AgfJKhQvpLe VyNBjKQWPtvxc82A.plcGvJQUWAPNdSav1s9GLFC6jrFls9165fAXhsBwQeR Iu..TXuPvtX3uxksqtqypRE78talYEUTqAP8SesnNlVv7q_pB6ywndntFBQL mZEe2aZXwVgHCbDSnzJrksv2LVa2jp7TihCuBViI.MZgew1kCStVb23Q08SC vOr96_0SWevrC0x9qZhYlTiUWNzWsEpysKlzAZBE9h2oO_.xa.veHD7ybf9z 3NbLhfYeAm0nUxERxo2wuBFPXDFqE__ewHl1DhkcHGOKMG3MfcC9RSCgYIpj 26p4M3R1x1VvHWkAHlzTEcGGamUv7tDStmMStZeGlakbXDPhf8ZCM6O3O3rM sg9NZwSIds0iKGtCYGvPmESJWFkEvUyWrNG5v4lcK7W4Z3xIuiGAN7HvYmS1 X41wnJvo9fUtr.tre5mpX X-Yahoo-SMTP: tW.h3tiswBBMXO2coYcbPigGD5Lt6zY_.Zc- From: Marek Lindner To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] net, batman: don't crash on zero length strings in routing_algo Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:30:42 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Pau Koning , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de, Sasha Levin , davem@davemloft.net References: <1353355695-23252-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <201212250336.36874.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <201212250336.36874.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212251630.42980.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 03:36:36 Marek Lindner wrote: > > >> > empty, this assumption is wrong: > > >> Why isn't this patch part of Linux 3.7? It seems to be a bugfix and it > > >> was sent early enough? > > > > > > The patch received a reply mere 2 hours after it was sent. Again, > > > please read all mails before making noise. > > > > Ok, leaving this problem unsolved is the correct way to handle it? > > Nobody is allowed to say anything? > > No, of course you are allowed "to say" something. I was simply pointing you > to the explanation why the patch wasn't merged yet. Let me add here: Feel free to do the required cleanup work and re-submit the patch. Nobody stops you from doing that as well. :-) Cheers, Marek