From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: Reintroduce uprobe_consumer->filter()
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121228181314.GA6141@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121228181252.GA6120@redhat.com>
Finally add uprobe_consumer->filter() and change consumer_filter()
to actually call this method.
Note that ->filter() accepts mm_struct, not task_struct. Because:
1. We do not have for_each_mm_user(mm, task).
2. Even if we implement for_each_mm_user(), ->filter() can
use it itself.
3. It is not clear who will actually need this interface to
do the "nontrivial" filtering.
Another argument is "enum uprobe_filter_ctx", consumer->filter() can
use it to figure out why/where it was called. For example, perhaps
we can add UPROBE_FILTER_PRE_REGISTER used by build_map_info() to
quickly "nack" the unwanted mm's. In this case consumer should know
that it is called under ->i_mmap_mutex.
See the previous discussion at http://marc.info/?t=135214229700002
Perhaps we should pass more arguments, vma/vaddr?
Note: this patch obviously can't help to filter out the child created
by fork(), this will be addressed later.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 83742b9..c2df693 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -35,8 +35,17 @@ struct inode;
# include <asm/uprobes.h>
#endif
+enum uprobe_filter_ctx {
+ UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER,
+ UPROBE_FILTER_UNREGISTER,
+ UPROBE_FILTER_MMAP,
+};
+
struct uprobe_consumer {
int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
+ bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
+ enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx,
+ struct mm_struct *mm);
struct uprobe_consumer *next;
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 60b0a90..e2ebb6f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -579,19 +579,21 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
return ret;
}
-static inline bool consumer_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+static inline bool consumer_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
+ enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return true; /* TODO: !uc->filter || uc->filter(...) */
+ return !uc->filter || uc->filter(uc, ctx, mm);
}
-static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe,
+ enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
bool ret = false;
down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
- ret = consumer_filter(uc);
+ ret = consumer_filter(uc, ctx, mm);
if (ret)
break;
}
@@ -772,10 +774,12 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
if (is_register) {
/* consult only the "caller", new consumer. */
- if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers))
+ if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers,
+ UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER, mm))
err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
} else if (test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags)) {
- if (!filter_chain(uprobe))
+ if (!filter_chain(uprobe,
+ UPROBE_FILTER_UNREGISTER, mm))
err |= remove_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, info->vaddr);
}
@@ -968,7 +972,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
if (!fatal_signal_pending(current) &&
- filter_chain(uprobe)) {
+ filter_chain(uprobe, UPROBE_FILTER_MMAP, vma->vm_mm)) {
unsigned long vaddr = offset_to_vaddr(vma, uprobe->offset);
install_breakpoint(uprobe, vma->vm_mm, vma, vaddr);
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-28 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-28 18:12 [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-28 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Rationalize the usage of filter_chain() Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-03 11:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-28 18:13 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-01-03 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: Reintroduce uprobe_consumer->filter() Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121228181314.GA6141@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox