* [PATCH] x86/perf_events: build fix
@ 2012-11-23 16:28 Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <20121227192106.GA14257@digium.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2012-11-23 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, tglx, hpa; +Cc: linux-kernel
At least some older gcc versions dislike mixing constant and non-const
data in the same section ("... causes a section type confict"). Newer
gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what we want, but
also is not a big problem as it gets discarded post-init anyway).
Also get the Knight's Corner definitions in sync.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- 3.7-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
+++ 3.7-rc6-x86-perf-initconst/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x002b,
};
-static __initconst u64 knc_hw_cache_event_ids
+static const u64 __initconst knc_hw_cache_event_ids
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_forma
NULL,
};
-static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = {
+static const struct x86_pmu knc_pmu __initconst = {
.name = "knc",
.handle_irq = knc_pmu_handle_irq,
.disable_all = knc_pmu_disable_all,
--- 3.7-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
+++ 3.7-rc6-x86-perf-initconst/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[]
};
-static __initconst u64 p6_hw_cache_event_ids
+static const u64 __initconst p6_hw_cache_event_ids
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20121227192106.GA14257@digium.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] x86/perf_events: build fix [not found] ` <20121227192106.GA14257@digium.com> @ 2012-12-27 19:23 ` Shaun Ruffell 2013-01-09 17:22 ` [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error Shaun Ruffell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Shaun Ruffell @ 2012-12-27 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Vince Weaver, Linux Kernel [forgot to copy lkml] Hi Jan, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:28:32PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > At least some older gcc versions dislike mixing constant and non-const > data in the same section ("... causes a section type confict"). Newer > gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what we want, but > also is not a big problem as it gets discarded post-init anyway). > > Also get the Knight's Corner definitions in sync. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c | 4 ++-- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- 3.7-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c > +++ 3.7-rc6-x86-perf-initconst/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x002b, > }; > > -static __initconst u64 knc_hw_cache_event_ids > +static const u64 __initconst knc_hw_cache_event_ids > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_forma > NULL, > }; > > -static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = { > +static const struct x86_pmu knc_pmu __initconst = { > .name = "knc", > .handle_irq = knc_pmu_handle_irq, > .disable_all = knc_pmu_disable_all, > --- 3.7-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c > +++ 3.7-rc6-x86-perf-initconst/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[] > > }; > > -static __initconst u64 p6_hw_cache_event_ids > +static const u64 __initconst p6_hw_cache_event_ids > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = > > > > -- I was testing out 3.8-rc1 when I ran into the same problem resolved by this patch when building with gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51) Were you given a reason why this shouldn't be needed? It looks like the build error was introduced by (e09df47 "perf/x86: Update/fix generic events on P6 PMU") which is in v3.7 as well. Thanks, Shaun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error. 2012-12-27 19:23 ` Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-09 17:22 ` Shaun Ruffell 2013-01-09 21:59 ` Shaun Ruffell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-09 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Vince Weaver, Ingo Molnar, Jan Beulich, Rob Landley, linux-kernel, stable From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> This patch fixes a build regression first introduced in 3.7 with (e09df47 "perf/x86: Update/fix generic events on P6 PMU"). At least some older versions of gcc, like (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51), dislike mixing constant and non-const data in the same section. Without this patch a build will fail with the following error: CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c:22: error: p6_hw_cache_event_ids causes a section type conflict make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o] Error 1 Newer versions of gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what we want, but also is not a big problem as it gets discarded post-init anyway). Also get the Knight's Corner definitions in sync. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.7.x only [sruffell@digium.com: Added details to the commit message.] Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> --- Hans, Thomas, Any chance of picking this up for 3.8? This doesn't seem too controversial since it only makes sure that data in the __initconst section is const. Rob Landley also reported this to the list here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/511. Thanks, Shaun arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c index 4b7731b..838fa87 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] = [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x002b, }; -static __initconst u64 knc_hw_cache_event_ids +static const u64 __initconst knc_hw_cache_event_ids [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_formats_attr[] = { NULL, }; -static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = { +static const struct x86_pmu knc_pmu __initconst = { .name = "knc", .handle_irq = knc_pmu_handle_irq, .disable_all = knc_pmu_disable_all, diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c index f2af39f..b1e2fe1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[] = }; -static __initconst u64 p6_hw_cache_event_ids +static const u64 __initconst p6_hw_cache_event_ids [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = -- 1.8.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error. 2013-01-09 17:22 ` [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-09 21:59 ` Shaun Ruffell 2013-01-20 19:45 ` Shaun Ruffell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-09 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Vince Weaver, Ingo Molnar, Jan Beulich, Rob Landley, linux-kernel, stable From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> This patch fixes a build regression first introduced in 3.7 with (e09df47 "perf/x86: Update/fix generic events on P6 PMU"). At least some older versions of gcc, like (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51), dislike mixing constant and non-const data in the same section. Without this patch a build will fail with the following error: CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c:22: error: p6_hw_cache_event_ids causes a section type conflict make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o] Error 1 Newer versions of gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what we want, but also is not a big problem as it gets discarded post-init anyway). Also get the Knight's Corner definitions in sync. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7.x only [sruffell@digium.com: Added details to the commit message.] Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> --- [I had the wrong stable email address when I previously sent this. Sorry about the extra noise.] Hans, Thomas, Any chance of picking this up for 3.8? This doesn't seem too controversial since it only makes sure that data in the __initconst section is const. Rob Landley also reported this to the list here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/511. Thanks, Shaun arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c index 4b7731b..838fa87 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] = [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x002b, }; -static __initconst u64 knc_hw_cache_event_ids +static const u64 __initconst knc_hw_cache_event_ids [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_formats_attr[] = { NULL, }; -static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = { +static const struct x86_pmu knc_pmu __initconst = { .name = "knc", .handle_irq = knc_pmu_handle_irq, .disable_all = knc_pmu_disable_all, diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c index f2af39f..b1e2fe1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[] = }; -static __initconst u64 p6_hw_cache_event_ids +static const u64 __initconst p6_hw_cache_event_ids [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = -- 1.8.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error. 2013-01-09 21:59 ` Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-20 19:45 ` Shaun Ruffell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Shaun Ruffell @ 2013-01-20 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Vince Weaver, Ingo Molnar, Jan Beulich, Rob Landley, linux-kernel, stable Bump. Still an issue with v3.8-rc4. Am I mistaken in thinking this patch is trivial and obviously correct? Thanks, Shaun On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0600, Shaun Ruffell wrote: > From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> > > This patch fixes a build regression first introduced in 3.7 with > (e09df47 "perf/x86: Update/fix generic events on P6 PMU"). > > At least some older versions of gcc, like (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat > 4.1.2-51), dislike mixing constant and non-const data in the same > section. Without this patch a build will fail with the following error: > > CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c:22: error: p6_hw_cache_event_ids causes a section type conflict > make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.o] Error 1 > > Newer versions of gcc simply emits the section as writable (which isn't what > we want, but also is not a big problem as it gets discarded post-init anyway). > > Also get the Knight's Corner definitions in sync. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7.x only > [sruffell@digium.com: Added details to the commit message.] > Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> > > --- > > [I had the wrong stable email address when I previously sent this. > Sorry about the extra noise.] > > Hans, Thomas, > > Any chance of picking this up for 3.8? This doesn't seem too > controversial since it only makes sure that data in the __initconst > section is const. > > Rob Landley also reported this to the list here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/511. > > Thanks, > Shaun > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c | 4 ++-- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c > index 4b7731b..838fa87 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] = > [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x002b, > }; > > -static __initconst u64 knc_hw_cache_event_ids > +static const u64 __initconst knc_hw_cache_event_ids > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_formats_attr[] = { > NULL, > }; > > -static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = { > +static const struct x86_pmu knc_pmu __initconst = { > .name = "knc", > .handle_irq = knc_pmu_handle_irq, > .disable_all = knc_pmu_disable_all, > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c > index f2af39f..b1e2fe1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[] = > > }; > > -static __initconst u64 p6_hw_cache_event_ids > +static const u64 __initconst p6_hw_cache_event_ids > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] > [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = > -- > 1.8.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-20 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-23 16:28 [PATCH] x86/perf_events: build fix Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <20121227192106.GA14257@digium.com>
2012-12-27 19:23 ` Shaun Ruffell
2013-01-09 17:22 ` [PATCH] x86/perf_events: Fix "section type conflict" build error Shaun Ruffell
2013-01-09 21:59 ` Shaun Ruffell
2013-01-20 19:45 ` Shaun Ruffell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox