linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, walken@google.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	knoel@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86,smp: proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:30:05 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110023004.GB1636@x61.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130108173241.3e1b1d2d@annuminas.surriel.com>

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:32:41PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Subject: x86,smp: proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks
> 
> Simple fixed value proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks.
> By pounding on the cacheline with the spin lock less often,
> bus traffic is reduced. In cases of a data structure with
> embedded spinlock, the lock holder has a better chance of
> making progress.
> 
> If we are next in line behind the current holder of the
> lock, we do a fast spin, so as not to waste any time when
> the lock is released.
> 
> The number 50 is likely to be wrong for many setups, and
> this patch is mostly to illustrate the concept of proportional
> backup. The next patch automatically tunes the delay value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>


>  arch/x86/kernel/smp.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> index 20da354..aa743e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -117,11 +117,28 @@ static bool smp_no_nmi_ipi = false;
>   */
>  void ticket_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock, struct __raw_tickets inc)
>  {
> +	__ticket_t head = inc.head, ticket = inc.tail;
> +	__ticket_t waiters_ahead;
> +	unsigned loops;
> +
>  	for (;;) {
> -		cpu_relax();
> -		inc.head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
> +		waiters_ahead = ticket - head - 1;
> +		/*
> +		 * We are next after the current lock holder. Check often
> +		 * to avoid wasting time when the lock is released.
> +		 */
> +		if (!waiters_ahead) {
> +			do {
> +				cpu_relax();
> +			} while (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) != ticket);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		loops = 50 * waiters_ahead;
> +		while (loops--)
> +			cpu_relax();
>  
> -		if (inc.head == inc.tail)
> +		head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
> +		if (head == ticket)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  }
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-08 22:26 [PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning Rik van Riel
2013-01-08 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86,smp: auto tune spinlock backoff delay factor Rik van Riel
2013-01-10  3:13   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-01-10 12:49   ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-08 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address Rik van Riel
2013-01-10  3:14   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-01-10 13:01   ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-10 13:05     ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-10 13:15       ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-08 22:32 ` [DEBUG PATCH 5/5] x86,smp: add debugging code to track spinlock delay value Rik van Riel
2013-01-08 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86,smp: proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks Rik van Riel
2013-01-08 22:50   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-08 22:54     ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-10  2:30   ` Rafael Aquini [this message]
2013-01-08 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86,smp: move waiting on contended ticket lock out of line Rik van Riel
2013-01-08 22:43   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 17:38   ` Raghavendra K T
2013-01-09 12:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning Raghavendra K T
2013-01-10  2:27   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-01-10 17:36     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-01-11 20:11       ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-13 18:07         ` Raghavendra K T
2013-01-10 15:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-10 15:31   ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-10 19:30     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-24 13:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-10 22:24 ` Chegu Vinod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130110023004.GB1636@x61.redhat.com \
    --to=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=knoel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).