From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, eric.y.miao@gmail.com,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, haojian.zhuang@gmail.com,
chao.bi@intel.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] spi/pxa2xx: make clock rate configurable from platform data
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110095803.GJ13897@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4412354.TD27KzhhVJ@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:07:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> We hardcode different kinds of information into the kernel anyway, but it
> would be good to be able to use some criteria to decide whether or not we need
> that information on the given system.
>
> In this particular case, we'll only need the fixed clock rate for the SPI
> which is not present on other x86 systems to date.
>
> Mika, do you have any idea what checks to apply to figure out whether or not
> the SPI clock will be necessary?
I've tried to figure out them but so far I have no ideas :-/
If we put that behind some config option, it 1) confuses users and 2)
distro makers will select it anyway, so I don't see this as an option.
> Perhaps we can add a check into acpi_create_platform_device()? Something like
> "if the device ID is present in table X, then run function Y for the device"
> where Y will configure the clock if the SPI is matched?
That would work but then we must also make sure that if the device was
enumerated from PCI, it gets this clock via some other means.
The LPSS devices can be configured to either appear on PCI or ACPI and of
course ACPI has the advantage because then we can enumerate the slave
devices behind the bus as well. However, it might be possible that we need
to support PCI enumeration at some point.
Furthermore, the SPI controller has an existing PCI glue driver
(spi-pxa2xx-pci.c) that needs to pass this clock as well. This is for Intel
CE4100 platform and we must make sure that it still works after our change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 10:44 [PATCH 00/11] spi/pxa2xx: add Intel Lynxpoint SPI controller support Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] spi/pxa2xx: allow building on a 64-bit kernel Mika Westerberg
2013-01-08 3:27 ` Eric Miao
2013-01-08 10:29 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] spi/pxa2xx: convert to the pump message infrastructure Mika Westerberg
2013-01-17 9:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] spi/pxa2xx-pci: switch to use pcim_* interfaces Mika Westerberg
2013-01-08 10:59 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] spi/pxa2xx: embed the ssp_device to platform data Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] spi/pxa2xx: make clock rate configurable from " Mika Westerberg
2013-01-08 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-08 12:41 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-08 13:10 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-08 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-09 10:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-09 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 10:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-09 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-09 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 9:58 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-01-10 12:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-10 12:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 12:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-10 13:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-10 13:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 13:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-10 13:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 13:33 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-10 13:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-10 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-11 10:59 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-10 13:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-08 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] spi/pxa2xx: use the private DMA API only when CONFIG_ARCH_PXA is set Mika Westerberg
2013-01-17 9:36 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-17 10:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] spi/pxa2xx: add support for DMA engine Mika Westerberg
2013-01-17 9:48 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-17 10:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] spi/pxa2xx: add support for runtime PM Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] spi/pxa2xx: add support for SPI_LOOP Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] spi/pxa2xx: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem SPI Mika Westerberg
2013-01-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] spi/pxa2xx: add support for Lynxpoint SPI controllers Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130110095803.GJ13897@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chao.bi@intel.com \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).