Re: [resend][PATCH 03/16] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function

Vinod Koul
2013-01-09T15:34:22Z

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > n 9 January 2013 19:20, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> >>> +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> >>> +}
> >> After reading the subsequent patch I understand what is intent here. Perhaps
> >> is_slave_dirn() would have been a beter one...
> >
> > dirn isn't readable, it took me some time to understand the intent...
> > Either have xfer or direction :)
>
> Agree with Viresh. I might rename it to is_slave_direction if you want to.
direction sounds fine too.

--
~Vinod