From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@ti.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>, "Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@ti.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator-core: update all enable GPIO state in _enable/disable
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:42:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130113224220.GE5041@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A874F61F95741C4A9BA573A70FE3998F69E122AA@DQHE02.ent.ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:46:12AM +0000, Kim, Milo wrote:
> + /* Update shared enable pin state */
> + list_for_each_entry(r, ®ulator_list, list) {
> + if (r->ena_gpio == gpio)
> + r->ena_gpio_state = enable ? 1 : 0;
> + }
> +}
This isn't quite going to work properly - we need to actually move the
state (and also a reference count) into some sort of shared state.
Otherwise consider what happens in this scenario:
1. regulator 1 enables
2. regulator 2 enables
3. regulator 1 disables
Since regulator 1 doesn't know anything about regulator 2 it'll not know
that regulator 2 should still be enabled so it'll put the GPIO into the
disabled state. It'll be OK if regulator 1 and regulator 2 always have
the same state but if they ever differ then we'll not do the right thing.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-13 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 9:46 [PATCH 2/3] regulator-core: update all enable GPIO state in _enable/disable Kim, Milo
2013-01-13 22:42 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-01-13 23:35 ` Kim, Milo
2013-01-14 1:42 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-14 2:44 ` Kim, Milo
2013-01-14 2:50 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-21 23:59 ` Kim, Milo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130113224220.GE5041@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=Milo.Kim@ti.com \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).