From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756941Ab3ANRBh (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:01:37 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:41017 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756635Ab3ANRBf (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:01:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:01:34 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Mel Gorman Cc: Sedat Dilek , Linus Torvalds , LKML , linux-mm , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Unique commit-id for "mm: compaction: [P,p]artially revert capture of suitable high-order page" Message-ID: <20130114170134.GA26655@kroah.com> References: <20130114103612.GO13304@suse.de> <20130114130911.GQ13304@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130114130911.GQ13304@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:09:11PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > >> Hi Linus, > > >> > > >> I see two different commit-id for an identical patch (only subject > > >> line differs). > > >> [1] seems to be applied directly and [2] came with a merge of akpm-fixes. > > >> What is in case of backports for -stable kernels? > > > > > > I do not expect it to matter. I was going to use > > > 8fb74b9fb2b182d54beee592350d9ea1f325917a as the commit ID whenever I got > > > the complaint mail from Greg's tools about a 3.7 merge failure. The 3.7.2 > > > backport looks like this. > > > > > > > Oh cool and thanks! > > Are you planning to resend this backport-patch to the lists w/ a "3.7" > > (or for-3.7) in the commit-subject? > > > > Yes, when I get the reject mail from Greg's tools. You should have that rejection email now :)