From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751699Ab3AOFX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:56 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:20736 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758Ab3AOFXz (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:55 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,471,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="273810350" Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:27:23 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mike Turquette , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , Heikki Krogerus , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: enable common clk and add support for Lynxpoint clocks Message-ID: <20130115052723.GM13897@intel.com> References: <1358174788-24439-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358174788-24439-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Hi all, > > The discussion that lead to this patch series starts from the below thread: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1417691 > > In summary, there is no point in adding a special case code to the drivers > in order to pass them a fixed clock rate, but instead x86 should just > enable common clk subsystem and take advantage of it. > > This has been proposed before by Mark Brown but for some reason it has not > merged into x86 tree. > > This series tries to do the same but in this time we have real users for > the clk API. > > [1/3] Enables the common clk framework on x86 > [2/3] Adds Intel Lynxpoint Low Power Subsystem specific clocks as platform > driver. > [3/3] Creates the platform device for the LPSS clocks driver if we find out > that the Lynxpoint LPSS devices are available. > > This series is based on Rafael's linux-pm/linux-next branch because there > is a dependency to the ACPI scan rework by Rafael. I meant that they apply on top of 3.8-rcX but in order to patch [2/3] to work it needs to have the ACPI scan rework patches. Otherwise it is not able to find the base addresses of the devices.