[ 049/221] target/tcm_fc: fix the lockdep warning due to inconsistent lock state

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-15T22:28:16Z

From: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>

commit 9f4ad44b264f8bb61ffdd607148215566568430d upstream.

The lockdep warning below is in theory correct but it will be in really weird
rare situation that ends up that deadlock since the tcm fc session is hashed
based the rport id. Nonetheless, the complaining below is about rcu callback
that does the transport_deregister_session() is happening in softirq, where
transport_register_session() that happens earlier is not. This triggers the
lockdep warning below. So, just fix this to make lockdep happy by disabling
the soft irq before calling transport_register_session() in ft_prli.

BTW, this was found in FCoE VN2VN over two VMs, couple of create and destroy
would get this triggered.

v1: was enforcing register to be in softirq context which was not righ. See,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg03614.html

v2: following comments from Roland&Nick (thanks), it seems we don't have to
do transport_deregister_session() in rcu callback, so move it into ft_sess_free()
but still do kfree() of the corresponding ft_sess struct in rcu callback to
make sure the ft_sess is not freed till the rcu callback.

...
[ 1328.370592] scsi2 : FCoE Driver
[ 1328.383429] fcoe: No FDMI support.
[ 1328.384509] host2: libfc: Link up on port (000000)
[ 1328.934229] host2: Assigned Port ID 00a292
[ 1357.232132] host2: rport 00a393: Remove port
[ 1357.232568] host2: rport 00a393: Port sending LOGO from Ready state
[ 1357.233692] host2: rport 00a393: Delete port
[ 1357.234472] host2: rport 00a393: work event 3
[ 1357.234969] host2: rport 00a393: callback ev 3
[ 1357.235979] host2: rport 00a393: Received a LOGO response closed
[ 1357.236706] host2: rport 00a393: work delete
[ 1357.237481]
[ 1357.237631] =================================
[ 1357.238064] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 1357.238450] 3.7.0-rc7-yikvm+ #3 Tainted: G O
[ 1357.238450] ---------------------------------
[ 1357.238450] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[ 1357.238450] ksoftirqd/0/3 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes:
[ 1357.238450] (&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810834f5>] mark_held_locks+0x6d/0x95
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8108364a>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12d/0x197
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810836c1>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149caba>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x45
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01e8d10>] __transport_register_session+0xb8/0x122 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01e8dbe>] transport_register_session+0x44/0x5a [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018e32c>] ft_prli+0x1e3/0x275 [tcm_fc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa0160e8d>] fc_rport_recv_req+0x95e/0xdc5 [libfc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015be88>] fc_lport_recv_els_req+0xc4/0xd5 [libfc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015c778>] fc_lport_recv_req+0x12f/0x18f [libfc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa015a6d7>] fc_exch_recv+0x8ba/0x981 [libfc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa0176d7a>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x47a/0x4e2 [fcoe]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810549f1>] kthread+0xb1/0xb9
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff814a40ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 1357.238450] irq event stamp: 275411
[ 1357.238450] hardirqs last enabled at (275410): [<ffffffff810bb6a0>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x229/0x42a
[ 1357.238450] hardirqs last disabled at (275411): [<ffffffff8149c2f7>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x8e
[ 1357.238450] softirqs last enabled at (275394): [<ffffffff8103d669>] __do_softirq+0x246/0x26f
[ 1357.238450] softirqs last disabled at (275399): [<ffffffff8103d6bb>] run_ksoftirqd+0x29/0x62
[ 1357.238450]
[ 1357.238450] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1357.238450] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1357.238450]
[ 1357.238450] CPU0
[ 1357.238450] ----
[ 1357.238450] lock(&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock);
[ 1357.238450] <Interrupt>
[ 1357.238450] lock(&(&se_tpg->session_lock)->rlock);
[ 1357.238450]
[ 1357.238450] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1357.238450]
[ 1357.238450] no locks held by ksoftirqd/0/3.
[ 1357.238450]
[ 1357.238450] stack backtrace:
[ 1357.238450] Pid: 3, comm: ksoftirqd/0 Tainted: G O 3.7.0-rc7-yikvm+ #3
[ 1357.238450] Call Trace:
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149399a>] print_usage_bug+0x1f5/0x206
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8100da59>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2c/0x49
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81082aae>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug.part.14+0x1ae/0x1ae
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81083336>] mark_lock+0x106/0x258
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81084e34>] __lock_acquire+0x2e7/0xe53
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8102903d>] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x48/0xb4
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810ba6a3>] ? rcu_process_gp_end+0xc0/0xc9
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81085ef1>] lock_acquire+0x119/0x143
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149c329>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x8e
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] ? transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa01eacd4>] transport_deregister_session+0x41/0x148 [target_core_mod]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810bb6a0>] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x229/0x42a
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018ddc5>] ft_sess_rcu_free+0x17/0x24 [tcm_fc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffffa018ddae>] ? ft_sess_free+0x1b/0x1b [tcm_fc]
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810bb6d7>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x260/0x42a
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8103d55d>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x26f
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149b34e>] ? __schedule+0x65f/0x68e
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8103d6bb>] run_ksoftirqd+0x29/0x62
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8105c83c>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1a5/0x1aa
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8105c697>] ? smpboot_unregister_percpu_thread+0x47/0x47
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff810549f1>] kthread+0xb1/0xb9
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff8149b49d>] ? wait_for_common+0xbb/0x10a
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81054940>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x59/0x59
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff814a40ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 1357.238450] [<ffffffff81054940>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x59/0x59
[ 1417.440099] rport-2:0-0: blocked FC remote port time out: removing rport

Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Cc: Open-FCoE <devel@open-fcoe.org>
Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@risingtidesystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
+++ b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
@@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static void ft_sess_rcu_free(struct rcu_
{
struct ft_sess *sess = container_of(rcu, struct ft_sess, rcu);

- transport_deregister_session(sess->se_sess);
kfree(sess);
}

@@ -438,6 +437,7 @@ static void ft_sess_free(struct kref *kr
{
struct ft_sess *sess = container_of(kref, struct ft_sess, kref);

+ transport_deregister_session(sess->se_sess);
call_rcu(&sess->rcu, ft_sess_rcu_free);
}