linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jslaby@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Avoid softlockups in console_unlock()
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:37:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130115233742.e8571f92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358272714-23375-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:58:34 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:

> A CPU can be caught in console_unlock() for a long time (tens of seconds are
> reported by our customers) when other CPUs are using printk heavily and serial
> console makes printing slow.  This triggers softlockup warnings because
> interrupts are disabled for the whole time console_unlock() runs (e.g.
> vprintk() calls console_unlock() with interrupts disabled).

It should trigger the NMI watchdog in that case?

> We fix the issue by printing at most 1 KB of messages (unless we are in an
> early boot stage or oops is happening) in one console_unlock() call. The rest
> of the buffer will be printed either by further callers to printk() or by a
> queued work.

Complex.  Did you try just putting a touch_nmi_watchdog() in the loop?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-16  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-15 17:58 [PATCH] printk: Avoid softlockups in console_unlock() Jan Kara
2013-01-16  7:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-01-16 10:16   ` Jan Kara
2013-01-16 22:50     ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-16 23:55       ` Jan Kara
2013-01-17  0:11         ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 21:04           ` Jan Kara
2013-01-17 21:39             ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 23:46               ` Jan Kara
2013-01-17 23:50                 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-21 21:00                   ` Jan Kara
2013-01-29 14:54                     ` Jan Kara
2013-01-31  0:08                       ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-31 12:46                         ` Jan Kara
2013-01-31  7:44               ` anish singh
2013-01-31 21:21                 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130115233742.e8571f92.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).