From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758558Ab3AQDtt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:49:49 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43935 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758332Ab3AQDtr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:49:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:54:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Takashi Iwai , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem Message-Id: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> References: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm: > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch > > > Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer > should do this, not I, right? Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both. If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a week or two.