From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755467Ab3AROnt (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:43:49 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31642 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820Ab3AROns (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:43:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:43:46 +0000 From: thornber@redhat.com To: device-mapper development , Mike Snitzer , LKML Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Message-ID: <20130118144345.GA3077@raspberrypi> Mail-Followup-To: device-mapper development , Mike Snitzer , LKML References: <20130116104546.GA3869@raspberrypi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130116104546.GA3869@raspberrypi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:45:47AM +0000, thornber@redhat.com wrote: > I'll create a branch in my github tree with all three caches in. So > it's easy to build a kernel with them. (Mike's already combined > dm-cache and bcache and done some preliminary testing). git://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6.git branch 'all-caches' I managed to reproduce the hang with bcache that Mike described before. However I can see that it was running the test more quickly than eio at this point. - Joe