From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>,
Frodo Looijaard <frodol@dds.nl>,
Philip Edelbrock <phil@netroedge.com>,
Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com>,
Ronny Meeus <Ronny.Meeus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Creating an eeprom class
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:39:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130120223907.GA8424@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXkgLiBLFmwH_GR9hkjFgOJ5z1nSTQd9Q4pJud732Lb9Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> [plaintext and fixed address of David Brownell]
David passed away a year or so ago, so that's really not going to help :(
> Hi,
>
> Several of the eeprom drivers that live in drivers/misc/eeprom export
> a binary sysfs file 'eeprom'. If a userspace program or script wants
> to access this file, it needs to know the full path, for example:
>
> /sys/bus/spi/devices/spi32766.0/eeprom
>
> The problem with this approach is that it requires knowledge about the
> hardware configuration: is the eeprom on the SPI bus, the I2C bus, or
> maybe memory mapped?
>
> It would therefore be more interesting to have a bus-agnostic way to
> access this eeprom file, for example:
> /sys/class/eeprom/eeprom0/eeprom
>
> Maybe it'd be even better to use a more generic class name than
> 'eeprom', since there are several types of eeprom-like devices that
> you could export this way.
Does all of the existing "eeprom" devices use the same userspace
interface? If so, yes, having a "class" would make sense.
> Or should we rather hook the eeprom code into the mtd subsystem?
Why mtd?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-20 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 18:08 [RFC] Creating an eeprom class Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-01-20 22:39 ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-01-21 7:25 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-01-22 0:14 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-22 13:25 Laszlo Papp
2014-01-22 17:18 ` Curt Brune
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130120223907.GA8424@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Ronny.Meeus@gmail.com \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=bgardner@wabtec.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=frodol@dds.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrickdepinguin@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@netroedge.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox