From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752635Ab3ATXrT (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:47:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:46909 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752206Ab3ATXrR (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:47:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:47:14 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jon Mason Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang , Nicholas Bellinger Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] NTB: Update Version Message-ID: <20130120234714.GA21708@kroah.com> References: <1358586155-23322-1-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> <1358586155-23322-16-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358586155-23322-16-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:02:29AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > Update NTB version to 0.25 > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > --- > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > index b792ccd..df86882 100644 > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ > #include "ntb_regs.h" > > #define NTB_NAME "Intel(R) PCI-E Non-Transparent Bridge Driver" > -#define NTB_VER "0.24" > +#define NTB_VER "0.25" I'm not objecting to this, but in the end, does it really matter? Why not just stick with whatever kernel version you are using? Keeping this up to date is going to be hard over the long haul, right? thanks, greg k-h